The Tag System That Finally Made Sense for Me - From Perfectionism Paralysis to Discovery Freedom
The tag system that finally worked combined structured type tags for reliability with liberal topic tagging for discovery. Emergence beats planning for knowledge work.
For years, I wrestled with tags in my knowledge system. I'd spend 10 minutes agonizing over the "perfect" set of tags for a single note, only to later search for #books and get buried in hundreds of results: some actual book notes, most just notes that mentioned books somewhere.
In this article, I want to share the tag system breakthrough that transformed my relationship with my notes and unlocked the true power of my knowledge base.
Introduction
If you're building a knowledge system as a creator, you've probably hit the tag wall. You know tags are supposed to help you find things, but somehow they create more problems than they solve.
Maybe you've tried the minimalist approach; just a handful of carefully chosen tags. Or the opposite, tagging everything with every possible keyword until your tag list looks like alphabet soup. Perhaps you've spent hours designing the "perfect" tag taxonomy, only to abandon it three months later when it stops making sense.
In practice, most tag systems fail not because they're poorly designed, but because they're designed at all.
The tag system that finally worked for me emerged from a simple realization: tags aren't a filing system; they're a discovery system. And once I stopped treating them like folders and started treating them like search tools, my knowledge base improved heavily.
This matters because as creators, our knowledge isn't just something to organize. It's the raw material for everything we create. When you can't find your notes, you can't repurpose them. When your tag queries break, your content pipeline breaks. When you're paralyzed by tag decisions, you're not creating.
TL;DR
I finally built a tag system that works by combining structured type tags with liberal topic tagging. Type tags (isolated under type/) provide the foundation for reliable queries and automation, while freely added topic tags create multiple discovery paths to every note.
Key points:
- Type tags really need to be isolated in a namespace (e.g.,
type/booknot justbooks) to prevent query pollution - Add 5-10 topic tags per note based on gut feeling (no planning required)
- More tags paradoxically creates less overwhelm because they create multiple paths to rediscover notes
- Tag chaos is better than tag scarcity. you can always clean up later
- Habits and common tags emerge naturally over time without upfront design
- The system enables powerful workflows: building Obsidian Bases, aggregating research, repurposing content, querying notes, ...
- Tag consistency issues can be fixed during periodic reviews. Imperfection is perfectly fine!
- Rigid taxonomies fail at scale; emergence beats planning for knowledge work
- It's okay to be messy!
The Tag Systems That Failed Me
Let me tell you about my past tag struggles.
I'd create a note about a book I was reading; let's say a book about creativity. Should I tag it #creativity or #books? Both? What about #reading or #learning? I'd sit there, cursor blinking, overthinking a simple decision that should take seconds. Meanwhile, the actual insights from the book? Not captured. Because I was too busy optimizing my tag system.
I believed there was a "right" set of tags for every note. I'd research tagging best practices, study other people's systems, try to design the perfect taxonomy upfront. The result? Decision paralysis every single time I created a note.
I'd search for #books to find my book notes, and I'd get everything and the kitchen sink: meeting notes where someone mentioned a book, articles about books, random thoughts that referenced books. Buried somewhere in those hundreds of results were my actual book notes. The tag that was supposed to help me find things was making them harder to find.
Without clear rules, my tagging was chaos. Sometimes I'd use #meeting, sometimes #meetings. Sometimes #pkm, sometimes #knowledge-management. Every variation split my notes across different tags, making everything harder to find.
I knew tags were supposed to be powerful. I'd seen other people's elegant tag systems. But mine just... didn't work. And I couldn't figure out why.
The Breakthrough: Structure + Freedom
The breakthrough came when I stopped trying to design a perfect tag system and instead asked: What job do my tags actually need to do?
Two jobs, I realized:
- Structural job: Identify what TYPE of note this is (book, meeting, article, project, etc.)
- Discovery job: Create multiple paths to rediscover this note later
And the most important takeaway is that these jobs need different approaches.
The Type Tag Foundation
I started isolating my type tags under a type/ namespace:
type/bookinstead of justbookstype/meetinginstead of justmeetingtype/articleinstead of justarticletype/projectinstead of justproject
Now when I search for #type/book, I get ONLY my book notes. When I search for #books (without the type prefix), I get everything related to books, which is sometimes exactly what I want.
This became crucial for two workflows:
- Building Obsidian Bases: When I want to create a Base containing only my book notes, the query
#type/bookis rock-solid reliable. It won't break when I reorganize folders or change my structure. - Automation and workflows: Type tags enable automation. They power auto-filing, template selection, dashboard views, querying, and a ton more. Because they're consistent and isolated, they never create false positives.
If you're interested in how Obsidian Bases work and how they can transform your workflow, then check out my Obsidian Starter Kit. It includes first-class support for those, with many included Bases.

The Liberal Tagging Freedom
For topic tags — everything that's not a type tag — I made a radical shift. I stopped planning. I stopped optimizing. I just... tagged.
When I write or update a note, I add whatever tags come to mind. Usually 5-10 tags per note. No deliberation. No "is this the perfect tag?" Just gut feeling, habits and moving on.
Writing about a book on creativity? Tags might include:#creativity #books #reading #innovation #ideas #thinking #psychology #art #writing
Some of these might overlap. Some might be redundant. Some might never get used again. And that's completely fine.
When you tag information, don't look for the one perfect tag. Instead, add as many relevant keywords as you can. Those are pathways for you to stumble upon this note later
Why This Works (Even Though It Seems Wrong)
Here's what's counterintuitive about this approach:
More Tags = Less Overwhelm
You'd think adding 5-10 tags per note would create chaos. But the opposite happened.
When I was trying to find the "perfect" 2-3 tags, every tag decision felt heavy. Critical. Wrong tags meant losing the note forever. That pressure created paralysis.
With 5-10 tags? Each individual tag matters less. The pressure drops. I tag and move on. The act of tagging becomes effortless because no single tag has to be perfect.
Consider tags as breadcrumbs. Leave enough to find your way
Tag Redundancy Is Good
Traditional advice says eliminate redundant tags. Don't use both #writing and #content-creation, pick one!
But redundancy creates resilience.
When I'm searching for notes about writing, I don't remember if I used #writing or #content-creation or #content or #creating. But if I tagged liberally with whatever came to mind, at least one of those tags will be there. Multiple tags create multiple paths to the same note.
Each tag and link you add to a note adds a path to resurface that note later on
Tags Emerge, They Don't Get Designed
I don't plan my tag taxonomy anymore. I just tag based on gut feeling. Habits emerge naturally.
After tagging notes for a few months, I notice I keep using certain tags. Those become my "common tags". The ones that proved useful through actual use, not theoretical planning. Meanwhile, tags I rarely use just fade away. The system self-regulates.
This is knowledge management as emergence rather than planning. And emergence scales where rigid plans fail.
Tags Are for Future-You
Current-me doesn't need tags. I just wrote the note. I know what's in it.
Tags are for future-me, six months from now, trying to find that brilliant insight about creativity I captured from some book I can't quite remember.
I'm not tagging to organize files. I'm tagging to create breadcrumbs for future discovery. I'm leaving multiple paths for future-me to stumble upon this note when they need it.
How It Works in Practice
Let me show you how this plays out in actual creation workflows.
Research Aggregation Across Note Types
I'm writing an article about content creation systems. I need to gather all my relevant notes. But those notes are scattered across different types:
- Book notes:
#type/book AND #content-creation - Meeting notes with clients:
#type/meeting AND #content-creation - Personal insights:
#type/permanent_note AND #content-creation - Article drafts:
#type/article AND #content-creation - Random ideas:
#type/fleeting_note AND #content-creation
Because I have both structured type tags AND liberal topic tags, I can:
- Query all notes about content creation:
#content-creation - Filter by specific type when needed:
#type/book AND #content-creation - Exclude types I don't want:
#content-creation AND -#type/fleeting_note
The type tags give me precision. The topic tags give me coverage.
Repurposing Content Discovery
I'm repurposing old articles into a newsletter. Which articles should I combine?
I search for topics I'm interested in: #productivity #systems #creativity
Because I tagged liberally, notes that share multiple tags surface together. These unexpected combinations often reveal connections I didn't plan for. Perfect for content repurposing.
The liberal tagging created serendipity I couldn't have designed.
Content Pipeline Management
When I'm ready to write, I can filter my knowledge base by:
- Type: "Show me all permanent notes" (
#type/permanent_note) - Topic: "About productivity" (
#productivity) - Maturity: "That I haven't published yet" (
-#published)
The combination of structured and free-form tags enables sophisticated filtering without requiring perfect planning upfront.
Addressing the Objections
Let me tackle the concerns you might have.
"Won't I end up with hundreds of useless tags?"
Yes, you will. And that's fine.
Here's why: tag chaos is better than tag scarcity.
If you have too many tags, you can clean them up during periodic reviews. There are various tools you can use (including AI of course) to clean things up, merge similar tags, rename inconsistent ones, delete unused ones, ...
But if you DON'T tag something because you're waiting for the perfect tag? That note is basically lost forever.
Plus, the "chaos" self-regulates. Unused tags naturally fade into obscurity. Useful tags surface through actual use. Your tag cloud becomes a map of what actually matters to you, not what you thought would matter.
"Won't search results be overwhelming with so many tags?"
Not when you combine tags.
A single tag might return hundreds of notes. But #creativity AND #systems AND #writing? That narrows down fast.
The abundance of tags is actually what makes precise search possible. With 2-3 tags per note, you have limited query options. With 5-10 tags, you can slice and dice your knowledge in dozens of ways.
"How do I know which tags to use without a plan?"
Let gut feeling drive your choices.
When you're writing or updating a note, what words describe it? What topics does it relate to? What would you search for to find this note later? Just add those as tags.
Don't overthink it. Don't optimize. Just tag and move on.
After a few months, you'll notice habits emerging. Certain tags will appear over and over. Those are your actual taxonomy, revealed through use rather than designed upfront.
"What about tag consistency?"
It's a real issue. You'll end up with #pkm, #knowledge-management, #KM, #personal-knowledge-management, etc.
But that can be fixed later.
During periodic reviews (e.g., monthly, quarterly), spend 10-15 minutes to clean things up. It doesn't have to take a lot of time, and it can go a long way in keeping your system maintainable. I personally do this every few months.
This maintenance approach works better than trying to enforce perfect consistency upfront. Because upfront, you don't know which tags will actually be useful. Let usage reveal that, then standardize the winners.
What Changed for Me
Before this system, tagging felt like homework. A chore I had to do "right" or the whole system would fall apart. Now? I don't think about tags. They happen automatically while I write. My fingers type # and my brain suggests tags without conscious effort. The muscle memory is there.
I stopped treating my knowledge system like a library and started treating it like a garden.
Libraries need perfect categorization. Gardens need good soil and then... they grow. Some paths emerge from use. Some plants spread unexpectedly. Some connections you never planned become the most valuable.
Your PKM system is a garden. Daily notes are the seeds, atomic notes are the plants, and your knowledge base is the flourishing ecosystem. Nurture it daily
My tag system is messy. It has redundancies. It has inconsistencies I haven't fixed yet. And it works better than any "perfect" system I tried to design.
Because it's alive. It evolves with my actual needs rather than serving some theoretical ideal.
For Creators: Why This Matters
As creators, our knowledge isn't just something to organize. It's our competitive advantage.
When you can quickly aggregate all your notes on a topic across different sources (e.g., books, articles, conversations, ideas), you can create content faster without sacrificing depth.
When you can discover unexpected connections through tag combinations, you can repurpose and remix content in ways that feel fresh rather than repetitive.
When you're not paralyzed by tag decisions, you can focus on what actually matters: capturing insights and creating value.
The tag system I've described isn't just about finding notes. It's about building a content creation engine that scales with you.
Going Further
Want to dive deeper into building sustainable knowledge systems for creators?
Just getting started with Knowledge Management?
My Knowledge Management for Beginners course covers everything from first principles, including detailed guidance on tags, metadata, and building systems that grow with you. You'll learn:
- The different types of tags and when to use each
- How to build tag systems that scale from 100 to 10,000+ notes
- Practical workflows for tagging during capture, creation, and review
- How to leverage tags for content creation and knowledge work
- Real examples from my own 10,000+ note vault
- And so much more!

Ready to understand how to transform your workflow using Obsidian?
Check out the Obsidian Starter Kit. It's a complete system for organizing your notes, including ready-to-use templates, comprehensive automation, and battle-tested best practices for tagging that actually work at scale. The Kit includes:
- Solid systems that scale
- Dozens of pre-defined note types and corresponding templates
- Pre-configured tag structures for type and topic tags
- Templates that apply tags automatically
- Automated note filing based on type tags
- Complete documentation for every aspect
- And a ton more!
Want to connect with other creators building knowledge systems?
Join the Knowii Community where creators share their systems, workflows, and discoveries about knowledge management. It's a space to learn from others, get feedback on your approach, and stay motivated on your PKM journey.
And don't forget to subscribe to my newsletter for weekly insights on knowledge management, productivity, AI, and intentional living.
Conclusion
The tag system that finally worked for me isn't elegant. It's not perfectly designed. It's not what the experts recommend.
But it works. And that's what matters.
Here's what I learned:
- Structure where it matters (type tags), freedom where it helps (topic tags)
- More is better than perfect when it comes to discovery
- Emergence beats planning for knowledge work
- Your system should serve you, not some theoretical ideal
- It's okay to be messy
If you're struggling with tags right now, here's my advice: start with type tags, then tag liberally for everything else.
Don't plan your taxonomy. Don't optimize. Don't agonize. Just add the tags that feel right and move on.
Your future self will thank you. Not because the tags are perfect, but because they're there.
Now I want to hear from you: What's your biggest tag struggle? Or if you've had a tag system breakthrough, what finally clicked for you? Share your story in the comments or reach out on X or through the Knowii Community. I read every response and love learning from your experiences.
That's it for today! ✨
About Sébastien
I'm Sébastien Dubois, and I'm on a mission to help knowledge workers escape information overload. After 20+ years in IT and seeing too many brilliant minds drowning in digital chaos, I've decided to help people build systems that actually work. Through the Knowii Community, my courses, products & services and my Website, I share practical and battle-tested systems. You can follow me on X 🐦 and on BlueSky 🦋.
I am an author, founder, and coach. I write books and articles about Knowledge Work, Personal Knowledge Management, Note-taking, Lifelong Learning, Personal Organization, and Zen Productivity. I also craft lovely digital products.
If you want to follow my work, then become a member and join our community.
Ready to get to the next level?
If you're tired of information overwhelm and ready to build a reliable knowledge system:
- 🎯 Join Knowii and get access to my complete knowledge transformation system
- 📚 Take the Course and Master Knowledge Management
- 🚀 Start with a Rock-solid System: the Obsidian Starter Kit
- 🦉 Get Personal Coaching: Work with me 1-on-1
- 🛒 Check out my other products and services. These will give you a rock-solid starting point for your note-taking and Knowledge Management efforts
